Pl. | Mannschaft | Sp. | Tore | Diff. | Pkt | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Mannheim | 29 | 60:14 | 46 | 70 | |
2 | Nöttingen | 28 | 68:36 | 32 | 60 | |
3 | Villingen | 29 | 50:34 | 16 | 51 | |
4 | Neckarelz | 28 | 45:40 | 5 | 46 | |
5 | FCA Walldorf | 28 | 44:30 | 14 | 44 | |
6 | St. Kickers | 29 | 46:37 | 9 | 42 | |
7 | Gmünd | 28 | 53:46 | 7 | 42 | |
8 | Balingen | 29 | 37:39 | -2 | 41 | |
9 | Hollenbach | 28 | 42:32 | 10 | 39 | |
10 | Illertissen | 28 | 36:28 | 8 | 38 | |
11 | Kehl | 29 | 44:41 | 3 | 38 | |
12 | Kirchheim/Te | 29 | 45:43 | 2 | 38 | |
13 | Bahlingen | 29 | 44:48 | -4 | 38 | |
14 | SSV Reutlingen | 28 | 42:51 | -9 | 35 | |
15 | SGV Freiberg | 28 | 30:51 | -21 | 33 | |
16 | Weinheim | 28 | 35:49 | -14 | 32 | |
17 | Neckarrems | 28 | 40:57 | -17 | 27 | |
18 | Durlach | 28 | 29:71 | -42 | 21 | |
19 | Linx | 29 | 24:67 | -43 | 10 | |
20 | TSV Rosenheim | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
21 | Seligenporte | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
22 | Schweinfurt | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
23 | SV Schalding | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
24 | Heimstetten | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
25 | Hof | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
26 | Rain am Lech | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
27 | Bayreuth | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
28 | Bamberg | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
29 | Ingolstadt II | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
30 | Buchbach | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
31 | U'haching II | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
32 | Ismaning | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
33 | Großbardorf | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
34 | Aindling | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
35 | TuS Regensbu | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
36 | Erlangen-Bru | - | -:- | 0 | - | |
37 | Würzburg | - | -:- | 0 | - |
Die Mannschaften auf den Plätzen 15 bis 19 steigen ab
Ich muss ja wissen, ob es sich in Bremen lohnt, den Dachboden auszubauen.
— Mario Basler zum Angebot eines Vier-Jahres-Vertrages beim SV Werder Bremen.